Green Performance
Environmental protection is a crucial cornerstone for corporate sustainable development. To this end, China Airlines is committed to implementing its "Environmental and Energy Policy," guided by four main operational pillars: "Sound Environmental and Energy Management Operations," "Deepening Carbon Management Practices," "Building Environmental Management Capacity in the Value Chain," and "Promoting Internal and External Environmental Awareness." Through regular and ad hoc meetings of the Corporate Environmental Committee, its five major environmental management committees, the Aviation fuel management team, and various functional project teams, the company continuously improves and enhances the ecological benefits of its operations. It actively manages environmental-related operational risks and opportunities within the aviation industry. For detailed performance information, please refer to the " environmental Performance Appendix."
Greenhouse Gas
In accordance with the guidelines of ISO/CNS 14064-1 and the Greenhouse Gases Protocol, CAL conducts annual surveys for international aviation fuel and greenhouse emissions of all ground operations to monitor the overall greenhouse gas emission conditions. Starting from 2015, CAL calculated the emissions from the products purchased, capital goods, fuel and energy-related activities not included in Scope 1 or 2, upstream and downstream transportation and distribution, waste treatment, employee commuting, upstream and downstream leased assets, and investments based on 15 classification requirements of the GHG Protocol Scope 3 Guidance. The greenhouse gas emissions are summarized below:
| Source of Emission | Analysis Method | Approach | Year | Types of GHG | Biofuel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Quantitative analysis | Annual GHG inventory and external verification | 2009 | CO2 , N2O, CH4, HFCs, |
SAF |
| Source of Emission | Analysis Method | Approach | Year | Types of GHG | Biofuel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Quantitative analysis | Annual GHG inventory and external verification | 2009 | CO2e | Based on the power generation structure published by Taiwan Power Company |
| Source of Emission | Analysis Method | Approach | Year | Types of GHG | Biofuel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Quantitative analysis | Perform annual identification, inventory and verification based on CAL’s indirect GHG emissions identification procedure and tool | 2020 | CO2e | Based on the emission source characteristics |
GHG Emissions of CAL, Mandarin Airlines, and Tigerair Taiwan
(Unit: tons CO2e)
| Scope of GHG | Company | Items | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category 1 | China Airlines | Flight operations | 7,059,083 | 5,787,751 | 5,875,531 | 5,435,050 | 6,048,568 | 6,224,228 | 6,525,728 |
| Ground Operations | 4,981 | 3,051 | 2,897 | 4,041 | 3,028 | 3,328 | 3,114 | ||
| Mandarin Airlines | Flight operations | 237,699 | 107,505 | 63,987 | 89,500 | 120.429 | 119,492 | 120,024 | |
| Tigerair Taiwan | Flight operations | 362,794 | 53,514 | 988 | 31,306 | 305,107 | 399,684 | 422,563 | |
| Category 2 | China Airlines | Ground operations | 18,169 | 17,572 | 16,697 | 16,468 | 15,767 | 15,079 | 16,138 |
| Categories 3-6(Note) | China Airlines | Ground operations | 1,607,690 | 1,326,227 | 1,364,016 | 1,240,935 | 1,389,211 | 1,432,790 | 1,529,257 |
Note 1: The statistics contain 100% of the aviation fuels used by China Airlines (including both domestic and overseas branches, outstations), Mandarin Airlines, and Tigerair Taiwan.
Note 2: In 2024, China Airlines' total greenhouse gas emissions amounted to 7,677,233 metric tons of CO2e (accounting for 100% of total emissions). This figure was verified with reasonable assurance by an accredited verification body in accordance with the ISO 14064-1:2018 inventory standard and certification standards ISO 14066:2011, ISO 14065:2020, and ISO 14064-3:2019, concluding with a pass. Prior to 2022, only off-station ground operation data (less than 0.03% of the total) were not subject to external verification.
Note 3: CAL adheres to ISO 14064-1:2018 and the GHG Protocol Scope 3 guidelines, 15 categories of emissions are calculated, including emissions from purchased goods, capital goods, fuel and energy-related activities not included in Scope 1 and 2, upstream and downstream transportation and distribution, waste disposal, employee commuting, upstream and downstream leased assets, investments, and others.
Note 4: Carbon intensity (ton CO2e / Million NTD) = GHG emissions / Revenue.
Note 5: In 2024, other Group Subsidiaries reported total emissions of 590,061 tons of CO2e for Categories 1 and 2, and 134,347 tons of CO2e for Categories 3-6.
Aviation Fuel Performance
-
Fuel Consumption (ton / PJ)
-
CO2Emissions (ton CO2e)
-
Transport Volume (Thousand RTK)
-
Fuel Efficiency (Fuel / Thousand RTK)
-
Carbon intensity (ton CO2e / Thousand RTK)
Note: Mandarin Airlines and Tigerair operate an all-passenger aircraft fleet.
Energy Conservation Management Performance
Sustainable Aviation Fuels (Cumulative three-year data)
Renewable Energy - Solar Energy (Cumulative three-year data)
| Types of Energy | Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-renewable Fuels | MWh/GJ | 21,053,443 / 75,786,331 | 23,429,847 / 84,340,702 | 24,109,748 / 86,788,148 | 25,454,114 / 91,627,481 |
| Renewable Fuels (Sustainable Aviation Fuel, SAF) |
MWh/GJ | 291 / 1,046 | 418 / 1,505 | 369 / 1,327 | 128,633 / 463,041 |
| Electricity (purchased) | MWh/GJ | 32,354 / 116,465 | 31,853/ 114,662 | 31,813 / 114,518 | 34,259 / 123,321 |
| Solar photovolatic (self-consumption) |
MWh/GJ | 110 / 396 | 119 / 428 | 108 / 389 | 197 / 710 |
Note 1: Non-renewable fuels include gasoline, diesel, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), liquefied natural gas (LNG), and aviation fuel. All CAL aircraft are counted as part of the calculation of aircraft fuel consumption.
Note 2: Renewable fuels include sustainable aviation fuels and solar photovoltaic.
Note 3: The calorific value of aviation fuel is calculated using the IPCC-announced coefficients, while the calorific values for natural gas and sustainable aviation fuel are derived from the actual values provided by the suppliers. The calorific values for residual fuel oil and diesel are calculated using the latest energy product unit calorific value table from the Energy Bureau.
Note 4: All were included in the data of overseas branches and have been externally verified since 2023.
Note 5: In 2019, CAL obtained Renewable Energy Certificates, and solar photovoltaic power began being used for self-consumption. Therefore, there was no solar photovoltaic systems power generation in 2019; statistics have been collected since 2020.
Noise and Air Pollution Control
Since the noise-free engine is still in the development stage, CAL has initially adopted the following measures to reduce negative impact of noise generated during take-off and landing on local communities and frontline personnel without affecting safety:
- All aircrafts in the fleet (A350-900, A330-300, A321neo, 777-300ER, 737-800, 777F, and 747- 400F) have conformed to international noise standards (noise level for Chapters 3 and 4 of ICAO Annex 16); in particular, noise of A350-900 is 16 dB lower than the current standards and 20% less than that of the same model of competitors.
- Implement flight takeoff and landing operations in accordance with the Noise Abatement Procedures announced by each airport.
- Encourage the flight crew to employ the continuous descent approach (CDA) to continue low-noise operations, lower noise level, and reduce fuel consumption.
- Pay noise charges according to regulations of each country's airports on noise prevention.
- Collect international information through international exchange platforms, such as IATA to continue to carry out noise reduction.
Among the gases emitted by aircraft engines, nitrogen oxides (NOx) and sulfur oxides (SOx) have a significant impact on the local air quality. CAL reduces the impact on ground air quality during aircraft takeoff / landing mainly through introducing low-pollution new aircraft, performing single-engine taxi operations (engine out taxi), and improving the efficiency of ground power units.In terms of fleet renewal, CAL has fully received 15 A350-900 aircraft, and all A340-300 and 747 passenger aircraft have been retired. In 2025, China Airlines introduced seven A321neo passenger aircrafts and one 777F cargo aircraft. In 2026, besides continuing to add A321neo passenger planes, China Airlines will welcome a new Boeing 787 fleet. With this modern and younger fleet, the airline aims to provide excellent passenger and cargo transportation services. Also, through a robust corporate environmental and energy management mechanism, we continuously achieve zero penalty operation targets and enhance operational ecological benefits.
Corporate NOx and SOx emissions
|
|
2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
| SOx | Emissions (ton) |
29.59 | 38.36 | 46.17 | 47.27 |
| Emission efficiency (g/RTK) | 0.0130 | 0.0094 | 0.0104 | 0.0108 | |
| NOx | Emissions (ton) |
120.64 | 400.60 | 482.23 | 493.70 |
| Emission efficiency (g/RPK) | 0.0183 | 0.0119 | 0.0130 | 0.0133 |
|
|
2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
| SOx | Emissions (ton) |
13.03 | 11.37 | 11.02 | 12.56 |
| Emission efficiency (g/RTK) | 0.0028 | 0.0027 | 0.0026 | 0.0027 | |
| NOx | Emissions (ton) |
135.84 | 118.79 | 115.14 | 131.22 |
| Emission efficiency (g/RTK) | 0.0291 | 0.0278 | 0.0276 | 0.0284 |
Note 1: The emissions of SOx and NOx are calculated using the formula "Total annual emissions = Number of flights x SOx/NOx Emission Factor (Tons / LTO)," where the emission factors are based on the latest numerical values announced by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of the United States for that year.
Note 2: LTO: refers to the landing take-off.
Note 3: Mandarin Airlines and Tigerair Taiwan have no cargo aircraft.
Note 4: Amendment of calculation method and coverage on CAL's NOx emissions from 2021 to 2022, excluding the pandemic's effect on flight dispatch.
|
|
2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
| SOx | Emissions (ton) |
26.58 | 27.81 | 28.66 |
| Emission efficiency (g/RTK) | 0.4004 | 0.4016 | 0.3941 | |
| NOx | Emissions (ton) |
277.54 | 290.45 | 299.30 |
| Emission efficiency (g/RPK) | 0.3863 | 0.3933 | 0.3951 |
Note 1: The emissions of SOx and NOx are calculated using the formula "Total annual emissions = Number of flights x SOx/NOx Emission Factor (Tons / LTO)," where the emission factors are based on the latest numerical values announced by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of the United States for that year.
Note 2: LTO: refers to the landing take-off.
Note 3: Mandarin Airlines and Tigerair Taiwan have no cargo aircraft.
Note 4: Amendment of calculation method and coverage on CAL's NOx emissions from 2021 to 2022, excluding the pandemic's effect on flight dispatch.
|
|
2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
| SOx | Emissions (ton) |
11.56 | 15.17 | 16.04 |
| Emission efficiency (g/RTK) | 0.0304 | 0.0271 | 0.0268 | |
| NOx | Emissions (ton) |
120.77 | 158.41 | 167.50 |
| Emission efficiency (g/RPK) | 0.0279 | 0.0285 | 0.0283 |
Note 1: The emissions of SOx and NOx are calculated using the formula "Total annual emissions = Number of flights x SOx/NOx Emission Factor (Tons / LTO)," where the emission factors are based on the latest numerical values announced by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of the United States for that year.
Note 2: LTO: refers to the landing take-off.
Note 3: Mandarin Airlines and Tigerair Taiwan have no cargo aircraft
Note 4: Amendment of calculation method and coverage on CAL's NOx emissions from 2021 to 2022, excluding the pandemic's effect on flight dispatch.
Waste Management
CAL manages waste according to five main principles: refuse, reduce, reuse, recycle, and repair. CAL's objective is to recycle 100% of waste and increase the waste recycling rate year by year. For more information, please refer to Commitment and Long-Term Goals. Considering that air transportation services are the core operations of the aviation industry, CAL actively participates in the IATA Cabin Waste Task Force discussions and has established a Waste Working Group. Since 2017, it has been collecting the total weight of cabin waste and recycled items.
Waste Management Performance
(Unit: Tons)
| Item | Waste produced | Disposal Method | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | ||
| General domestic waste | 113 | 122 | 118 | 138 | Incineration - with energy recovery |
| 629 | 986 | 948 | 839 | Incineration - without energy recovery (Delivered to the airport incineration plant in accordance with regulations and recommended the installation of electricity generation facilities) | |
| Resource recycling | 622 | 973 | 1,111 | 1,098 | Recycling and reuse - resource recycling |
| Hazardous industrial waste | 12 | 11 | 7 | 12 | Other treatment - heat treatment (e.g., sludge from electroplating) |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 0.72 | Other treatment - offshore treatment (e.g., batteries that contain cadmium) | |
| Non-hazardous industrial waste | 147 | 194 | 193 | 153 | Recycling and reuse - resource recycling (e.g., waste lubricants) |
| 47 | 127 | 113 | 200 | Other treatment - heat treatment (e.g., waste paint) | |
| Total | 1,572 | 2,414 | 2,491 | 2,441 | - |
Note 1: Third-party contractors were appointed for removing and offsite processing of waste for disposal. CAL implements inspections in accordance with the contract to ensure compliance with regulations.
Note 2: The scope covers the maintenance park, the CAL Park, the Kaohsiung branch office operations, VIP Lounge services at Taiwan locations, in-flight supplies for flights returning to TPE, catering operations, and cargo services at Taoyuan International Airport.
Note 3: Due to changes in the reporting process in 2024, the category of non-hazardous waste—waste wood—was newly included in the statistics starting in 2024. In 2025, the amount for this category was 166.41 metric tons (recycled).
Food Waste Management
| Source of waste | Performance Indicators | Waste Produced | Disposal Method | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |||
| VIP Lounge, Employee Canteen, and In-flight Meal Preparation | Amount Generated (ton) | 142 | 541(Note1) | 461 | 369 | Recycling: Composting and Pig Farming |
| Per Capita Generation – VIP Lounge(kg/person) | 0.017 | 0.034 | 0.032 | 0.029 | ||
| In-Flight Meal Service | Amount Generated (ton) | 632 | 1,610 | 1,863 | 2,095 | Incineration - with energy recovery (in accordance with quarantine requirements)(Note2) |
| Per Capita-meal Generation – In-flight Service(kg/person-meal) | 0.65 | 0.33 | 0.31 | 0.35 | ||
| Total | 774 | 2,151 | 2,324 | 2,464 | ||
Note 1:
Food waste incinerated in accordance with quarantine regulations and most general household waste that employees are unable to recycle are utilized for power generation through the cogeneration system at the incineration plant (Waste To Energy, WTE).
Note 2:
The scope covers the maintenance park, the CAL Park, the Kaohsiung branch employee cafeteria, VIP Lounge services at Taiwan locations, in-flight supplies for flights returning to TPE, and catering operations at Taoyuan International Airport. Excludes food waste generated by the employee cafeteria at the CAL Park in 2025, as it has been processed into soil amendment materials using a food waste processing unit.
Water Resource Management
The domestic sewage of CAL is collected and sent to the airport sewage treatment plant for treatment, and wastewater is bound to be produced in the aircraft maintenance process, which causes heavy damage to our environment and needs to be properly treated before discharge. Based on the concept of full recycling and treatment, CAL has established two wastewater treatment plants in the maintenance park to handle electroplating wastewater (containing heavy metals such as chromium and cadmium) and organic wastewater produced in the engine and aircraft maintenance processes through tertiary treatment prior to reuse and discharge into the Nankan river basin (level C water body defined by TW EPA). In the first line of control, well-qualified employees are trained to carry out the management and regularly monitor the quality of the discharged water in accordance with the strict regulations. A second and third-level supervision and inspection mechanism of the corporate environmental systems has also covering the issues for close monitoring.
| Water Usage Area (Source Type) |
Water Withdrawal (Note 1) (Kilotons) |
Water Consumption (Note 2) (Kilotons) |
Water Discharge (Note 3) (Kilotons) |
Recycled Volume (Note 4) (thousand tonnes) |
Recycling Ratio (%) |
|||
| 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 | |
|
CAL Park
(tap water) |
28.70 | 36.46 | 40.82 | 39.30 | 19.30 | 27.05 | 14.36 | 31.16% |
|
CAL Park
(rainwater) |
9.35 | 6.07 | 9.65 | 6.79 | ||||
|
EMO Park
(tap water) |
55.81 | 61.55 | 58.17 | 63.93 | 38.33 | Domestic: 11.50 |
NA | - |
| Industrial: 14.10 |
Industrial: 3.51 |
5.49% | ||||||
|
Taipei Branch
(tap water) |
4.02 | 4.18 | 3.91 | 4.23 | 2.07 | 2.17 | NA | - |
|
Songshan Office
(tap water) |
10.68 | 15.97 | 11.53 | 12.65 | 4.88 | 7.77 | NA | - |
|
Total
|
108.56 | 124.23 | 124.08 | 126.90 | 64.31 | 62.59 | 17.87 | 14.08% |
Note 1:
Scope covered by water meters: CAL Park, EMO Park, Songshan Office, and Taipei Branch.
Note 2:
The water consumption volume of CAL Park is calculated based on the water consumption of the equipment. The water consumption volume of Taipei Branch and Songshan Office is calculated proportionally based on the water consumption of CAL Park.
Note 3:
Wastewater treatment for the EMO Park includes industrial wastewater from Taiwan Aircraft Maintenance and Engineering Co., Ltd.
Note 4:
Water recycling includes rainwater and intermediate water recovery in the Park and wastewater recycled in the EMO Park.
| 2025 Test result | The first wastewater plant | The second wastewater plant | National Effluent Standards |
| PH | 8.0 | 7.0 | 6-9 |
| Water temperature (°C) | 26.9 | 26.9 |
|
| Suspended solid(mg / L) | <2.5 | 16.4 | 30 |
| Chemical Oxygen Demand, COD(mg / L) | 64.5 | 79.5 | 100 |
Announcement and Communication — Build an Image of Environmental Protection
As a member of the transportation services industry, CAL recognizes the need to integrate environmental processes with the nature of the operations and include these processes in the company's services. Therefore, environment management committees are individually established for cargo and passenger services to coordinate and carry out relevant environmental measures. To implement external communication, CAL communicates the corporate concept and performance of environmental protection with stakeholders through social media and in-flight magazines in hopes of creating and spreading the awareness of green consumption.
The key measures carried out in 2025 include:
Green Services and Communication
| Passengers and Shippers | Share new knowledge on environmental sustainability and increase green consumption awareness | In-flight entertainment system, in-flight magazine (Dynasty), official website, and social media posts |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Group (joint venture) Companies and Business Partners/th> |
|
Regular/periodic risk and opportunity surveys, invitations to physical/online courses, annual management communication meetings, etc. |
|